Together, they promote organizational accountability, transparency, and performance. The primary purpose of an audit report is to provide stakeholders—such as shareholders, investors, and lenders—with assurance that an organization’s financial statements are accurate and complete. A statutory auditor can use the report of an internal auditor in a meaningful manner to identify key risk areas and key internal controls in place and accordingly plan their statutory audit procedures. The Standards on Auditing applicable in India (SA-610) also prescribes the extent and manner in which a statutory auditor can use the work of an internal auditor. The scope of a statutory audit is defined by the relevant regulatory body or government agency that mandates the audit.
Internal audit and statutory audit are two different types of audits conducted by organizations. Internal audit is an independent and objective evaluation of an organization’s internal controls, risk management, and governance processes. It is conducted by an internal audit department or team within the organization. The purpose of internal audit is to provide assurance to management and the board of directors that internal controls are effective and risks are managed appropriately. On the other hand, statutory audit is a mandatory audit required by law or regulation. It is conducted by an external audit firm and its purpose is to difference between statutory audit and internal audit provide an independent opinion on the fairness and accuracy of an organization’s financial statements.
Typically, it encompasses a thorough review of the financial statements and accompanying notes, ensuring comprehensive scrutiny of the organization’s financial health. The scope of an internal audit is defined by the organization’s internal audit department and can encompass all aspects of operations, including financial, operational, and compliance areas. This comprehensive approach ensures that all relevant risks and controls are evaluated. An independent chartered accountant designated for this position performs a statutory audit.
Both types of audits have their place in ensuring your business runs smoothly. While owners give control of their business to management, they also lose theirs. With their control, the management may manipulate the records of the business to present an unfaithful representation. It may occur due to many reasons, such as not meeting goals or bad performances. Therefore, owners need a system to help them verify whether the financial statements present a true and fair view.
The Relationship Between the Statutory Audit and Internal Auditors
While both types of audits serve the purpose of evaluating an organization’s financial records, they differ in terms of their objectives, scope, and reporting requirements. In this article, we will explore the attributes of internal audit and statutory audit, highlighting their key differences and similarities. In a listed company, Internal Audit plays a crucial role in providing assurance to the board of directors and shareholders that the company’s operations are being conducted in a controlled and efficient manner. While statutory audit is focused on ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations and providing assurance to shareholders and other stakeholders. Unlike statutory audits, internal audit functions within a company typically have low legal liability.
The internal audit’s scope is broad and may cover, among other things, operational procedures, the risk management system, and adherence to the company’s internal policies in addition to financial reporting. Internal auditors can evaluate anything from the security of IT systems to HR procedures. An internal audit can be carried out by the company’s internal team or by contracting an outside consultant to carry out the review procedure. Its goal is to make sure that the organization’s governance, risk management, and internal controls are operating efficiently.
Statutory Audits
Empowered Systems is a leading provider of environmental, sustainability, and governance as well as governance, risk and compliance solutions with an expansive global customer base. Let us understand the concept of statutory audit in banks or any other entity with the help of a suitable example. We’re a headhunter agency that connects US businesses with elite LATAM professionals who integrate seamlessly as remote team members — aligned to US time zones, cutting overhead by 70%. They can accept their call given the records as they are examined and bona fide. They provided valuable insights that helped us balance compliance needs with operational improvements. In my experience, conducting regular audits has saved me from potential pitfalls.
- We’ve covered what audits are, why they’re important, and the differences between statutory and non-statutory audits.
- The primary objective of internal audit is to assess and enhance the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.
- Internal audit and statutory audit are distinct yet complementary components of the auditing process.
- The main goal of an internal audit is to ensure that an organization’s internal controls and risk management processes are operating effectively.
- However, the requirements of both statutory and internal audits are different.
- Management can increase operational efficiencies and pinpoint areas for improvement with the help of internal audits.
Navigating Internal Auditor Neutrality: Challenges and Solutions
Similarly, companies may also perform internal audits voluntarily without being required to do so. However, the requirements of both statutory and internal audits are different. For statutory audit, the law or auditing standards set the terms and provisions. For internal audits, while there are standards, the management of the company decides on the requirements.
For example, an operational audit helped us streamline our production process, leading to significant cost savings. We found several inefficiencies that, once addressed, saved us significant time and resources. Operational audits focus on the efficiency and effectiveness of business operations. They can help identify bottlenecks and recommend ways to improve productivity.
As shown, while statutory audits focus narrowly on verifying past financial statements, internal audits take a broader, forward-looking approach to improving business processes and controls. In each case, statutory audits ensure external compliance while internal audits focus on business-specific risks and optimizations. Statutory auditors have significant legal liability and accountability under law. As licensed professionals providing audit opinions on a company’s financial statements, statutory auditors are legally responsible for negligence, errors, or omissions in their reporting. If the audit fails to detect or disclose material misstatements or fraud, the statutory auditor can face legal consequences like fines, loss of license, lawsuits, and even criminal charges. For example, the external auditor would review XYZ’s financial statements to ensure that they are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).